2.5" wand, are you man enough?

[Greenie]

This was fwd to me from Shorty, downunder.

The 2.5" wand pictured is 28" wide

The one next to it with a standard 2" tube is only 20 " wide.....only..lol

The third wand is a 12".

The poor bastard is using some really stiff 2.5" hose.

I am curious the blower in the unit.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Carpet-Steam...5QQihZ001QQcategoryZ43015QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

 

[harryhides]

That's what happens when you spend too much time out in the midday sun and drinl so much beer.

Poor bastards are all "touched" down under.

 

[Greenie]

Those blower silencers crack me up.

Are stoddards really that hard to locate, even Michniak figured that one out eventually.

 

[Greenie]

holy crap, look at all the views, and no comments.

 

[Jimmy L]

Pull back wands only.
Won't glide like a well built CASTEX wand with stainless steel glides.

 

[Greenie]

Any wand that has a single bend, made of aluminum, has a 1.5" tube is hard to describe as "well built".

ANd for what you paid for it, and then had to replumb it for high pressure with that lame valve, it ought to be made from titanium.

Are you using both ports on your waste tank yet?

 

[Guest]

Anyone who wears nut high shorts to Connections should use a 1.5 inch wand.....

 

[alazo1]

I'm imagining an ape working that 28 inch.

Awesome.

Greenie, you should come up with a 20 one.

Albert

 

[Mike Brummett]

It sure looks like aluminum to me. Ought to be pretty light. Just needs a glide.

MIKE