Cleanworks
Moderator
Maybe they'll call it the Ripper.
Or, it's well developed.
Eagerly waiting.... I like new tools introduced.
Hopefully it will gain a bit more acceptance than their "salad bowl" upholstery tool hahahahahahahahaha now that was something to see. I wish I had one for historical reasons.
How long until somebody rips off the Bonzer?
. and hopefully the cleaning community's loyalty (or.....are they?)
If he's lucky the Bonzer is a Salad Bowl on a stick.
Why did the Stryker wand Fail... and Everyone Loves the Zipper?
And doesn't Karcher own the original patent for the Dual Vacuum Port Commercial Extraction Wand?
http://www.windsorkarchergroup.com/ViewCategories.aspx?Pid=133
I am sooo embarrassed to call you my friend!just my perverted mind
It's just your perverted mind.Is it just my perverted mind or doesn't that second picture resemble a certain women's body part?
My best guess is it was totally different, kinda like the EVO.I'm not trying to compare the looks, quality, or style but they function the same.
Although one is classified as a wand and the other as a walk behind.[FONT=arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
From my understanding, the Stryker wand is basically a dual vacuum port design with the solution jets centered in between (fed by one vacuum hose)
same as the zipper, the main difference is the distance between the vacuum ports and the type of jets- if that makes any sense?
My question was,
Why did the Stryker wand Fail... and Everyone Loves the Zipper?
I'm not trying to compare the looks, quality, or style but they function the same.
Although one is classified as a wand and the other as a walk behind.[FONT=arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
From my understanding, the Stryker wand is basically a dual vacuum port design with the solution jets centered in between (fed by one vacuum hose)
same as the zipper, the main difference is the distance between the vacuum ports and the type of jets- if that makes any sense?
My question was,
Why did the Stryker wand Fail... and Everyone Loves the Zipper?
I'm not trying to compare the looks, quality, or style but they function the same.
Although one is classified as a wand and the other as a walk behind.[FONT=arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
From my understanding, the Stryker wand is basically a dual vacuum port design with the solution jets centered in between (fed by one vacuum hose)
same as the zipper, the main difference is the distance between the vacuum ports and the type of jets- if that makes any sense?
My question was,
Why did the Stryker wand Fail... and Everyone Loves the Zipper?