Hack Attack
Member
considering the 12" means your covering 16-17% less each stroke, what is so good about it that justifies being that much slower than a 14"?
considering the 12" means your covering 16-17% less each stroke, what is so good about it that justifies being that much slower than a 14"?
carpal tunnel used to nail me from before I picked up a wand again, discovered topical iodine and msm with vit c orally ... its goneIt’s a carpal tunnel and back thing makes old guys feel 20 years younger!
will it help me retire sooner?If Tom designed it you know it’s better.
You could always just will it to me.Do I have enough time to regain the cost at my old age before I die and didn't earn enough to break even. Oh but dead is dead and then no problem . I still have my original wand from 1981 it still shines. jz.
all my wands are 12 inch, whether they are 1.5 or 2 inch diameter. You won't notice any difference from a 14considering the 12" means your covering 16-17% less each stroke, what is so good about it that justifies being that much slower than a 14"?
If it would improve the portable performance, I would be in on a 1.5 inch devastator.
I would like to understand how that 1.5 - 12 inch wand would improve performance with the Butler.
Better for dual wanders?
Would be nice to play around with it in August at the MF.
HahahahaThe devastator 12”. Thats what my wife calls me.
I agree. Add moving furniture and tabbing and moving hoses for the guy on the wand.My issue is with two guys on a truck, one goes pre vacuums the other sets up and pre sprays!
The vacuum guy crbs!
Then
Pre
Spray guy steams!
Unless there’s a lot of area to be cleaned dual setups doest look like a option for the most part!
I can do it but don’t!
That sounds like a Mexican dance.Are you still using that POS Castex?
You idiot!
Mexican wand dance. Dance around on the carpets. Sweat so much, you leave them soaking wet.That sounds like a Mexican dance.