My opinion, for what it’s worth, is that the product is not the weak link, it’s the ability to apply the product, in the field, in a way that is going to get “mill results”.
it’s simply not possible to reproduce the initial application in the field. With that being said, is applying protector to carpet better than not applying protector to carpet. Absolutely! But it comes down to value. Is the customers benefit equal to their expense?
Thats directly related to what you’re charging for the application of protection. I am in a position that I get protection EXTREMELY CHEAP in comparison with most name brands that are available at
Jon Don, Interlink Supply, etc... because of this I am able to offer carpet protection to my customers for $15 per area (up to 300 sq. ft). With this in mind, I think they are receiving a value equal to their expense.